感謝讚美上帝護理的大能与豐盛的供應。 本網誌內的所有資源純屬學習交流之用。

2017-07-18

 作者: John Samson    翻译: 骆鸿铭

 祷告是一个需要谦卑、弃绝骄傲、承认需要,以及认识对基督的靠赖之地。我们必须将依靠的祷告放在所有的努力之前,因为我们常常忽视祷告,并且尝试以自己意志的力量,去完成神放在我们心中,要我们去做的事。但是,另一方面,祷告却没有行动也是愚蠢的。在任何处境下,祷告却没有行动都不是明智的。Prayer is the place where humility is adopted, pride is abandoned, needs are admitted, and dependence acknowledged upon Christ. We must preface all endeavors with dependent prayer since too often we ignore prayer and seek to accomplish in the strength of our own wills those things God has placed on our hearts to do. But, on the other hand, prayer without action is also foolish. In most circumstances, it is not wise to prayer and then do nothing.

让我们举农夫为例:他不是只是祷告,盼望农作物会自己长出来。不,他会开垦贫瘠的土地,播撒种子,并辛勤工作直到收成。但是他也知道,没有降雨和气候的祝福,无论他如何地努力,他也无法得到收成。因此,农夫的耕作与上帝的祝福是同时都需要的。Consider the farmer: He does not merely pray and hope that crops will come forth. Rather, he plows up the fallow ground, sows his seed and labors until harvest. But he also knows that without the blessing of rain and climate, his harvest will never come, no matter how hard he works. So both the farmers' work and God's blessing is necessary for results.

同样地,当我们祷告时,我们不能只是坐着干等,期盼事情会发生。当我们看到神的旨意没有行在地上,我们必须同时祷告,并采取行动,改变才会发生。这个由祷告所驱动的行动是最有智慧的,也最有可能带来成功。正如耕种农作物一样,最终的结果仍要靠赖上帝对我们劳作的赐福。我们必须:1) 不可独立于上帝之外来工作;2) 不可停止手上的工作,等待奇迹发生;我们必须做工,好似结果要靠我们,与此同时,我们也安息在信心当中,相信一个荣耀的事实,即所有的事都要依靠掌权的上帝。这是圣经的模式,也是落在协同运作的教义(doctrine of concurrence)范畴内的。Likewise when we pray, we should not merely sit back and hope something will happen. When we see God's will not being done on earth we must both pray and work to see change take place. This prayer driven work is the most wise and likely to bring success. Like the planting of crops, the results are still ultimately dependent on God blessing the endeavor. We must 1) not work independently of God and 2) should not put our hands to rest only trusting in a miracle but must work as if the outcome depended on ourselves, while we rest in faith upon the glorious fact that everything depends on the sovereign Lord. This is the biblical model and would fall under the doctrine of concurrence.