顯示具有 基督信仰 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 基督信仰 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2017-04-24

/誠之

一般人的看法是基督教是個心胸狹隘的宗教因為它宣稱只有信耶穌才能上天堂否則就要下地獄因此基督教是個很『排外』exclusive、很霸道的宗教。但是,真理本來就是很『排外』、很『霸道』的,這就是『真理』的特性啊!對於真理的『排外』、『霸道』,我們是無可奈何的,誰叫它是真理呢!我們所屬的太陽系只有一個太陽,不是兩個;只有一個地球,不是兩個;地球只有一個月亮,不是兩個。但是我們不能因為真理只有一個標準答案,就說它是『排外』、『霸道』。這不是一個有理性的人會說的話。

但是,如果從另一個角度來看,基督教其實是非常『包容』(inclusive)的。為什麼呢?因為不是只有『好人』能上天堂,而『壞人』都必須下地獄。上帝要拯救的人,其實是罪人,而不是義人,連「罪人中的罪魁」(曾經大肆迫害基督徒的保羅對自己的評價)都是耶穌基督拯救的對象。因此,說基督教是最包容的,其實才是較正確的說法。

究其實,問題的關鍵在於,耶穌基督說祂是世人唯一的救主,祂來是要拯救罪人,到底是不是真理?如果是真理,我們就不能說它是排外霸道的,反而必須說它是非常包容的。這就需要我們好好去探究考察了。除非你真的認真作過考察,否則千萬不要用「基督教是個心胸狹窄、很排外的宗教」來成為你拒絕基督教的理由。

(標題小編加

参看:
Why Is Christianity So Closed-Minded and Exclusive? By Nicholas Davis

作者: Doug Powell  譯者誠之

沒有先考慮清楚或先調查清楚就相信一件事情並不是一個有信心的行動而是愚蠢。這並不像有些人以為的,沒有證據或理由就相信的,是一種種美德。那些說「你信就對了!」的人,其實是在宣告說,他根本不明白什麼是信仰。整個基督信仰的重點不是我們有信仰——世上其他的宗教或世界觀都是信仰,都需要信心。如果信仰本身是目的所有的人就都會得救了因為所有的人都相信某些東西。To believe in something without first seriously reflecting on it or looking into it is not an act of faith, it is an act of foolishness. It is not, as some have held, a virtue to believe something without evidence or reason. The person who says, “You just have to have faith,” is really just proclaiming he has no idea what faith is. The whole point of Christianity is not that we have faith—that is no different from any other religion or worldview. If just having faith were the goal, all would be saved since everyone believes something.

信仰本身不是目標。事實上不同宗教其差別在於各自有不同的信仰對象。信仰的內容才是關鍵。而信仰的內容是我們必須好好調查然後接受或棄絕的。No, faith itself is not the object. In fact, what differentiates religions is the object of each faith. The content of faith ultimately is what matters. And the content of a faith is what must be investigated and then embraced or rejected.

保羅的論證是根據一些可以被任何有興趣的人調查的事實。他承認說基督信仰若是真的就必須根據事實。保羅在耶穌一生的歷史、物理、時間層面上看到了接觸點。耶穌是一個真實的人物,祂曾經在某時、某地作過一些事,說過一些話。關於這些事,我們可以從耶穌生平和教導的見證人身上看到,也可以質問他們。Paul argued based on facts that could be investigated by anyone who was interested. He recognized that if Christianity was true, it must be rooted in facts. Paul saw the contact point in the historical, physical, temporal aspects of the life of Jesus. Jesus was a real person who did and said certain things in certain places at certain times. Witnesses to Jesus’ life and teaching could be found and questioned regarding these things.

耶穌的實況——祂的歷史真實性——是基督信仰的根基。缺少這個根基基督信仰就是不存在的。保羅對這個根基如此有把握以至於他在哥林多前書十五章1219指出了基督信仰最脆弱的宣稱Jesus’ reality—His historicity—is the foundation of Christianity. Without it, there is no Christianity. Paul was so sure of this foundation that he went so far as to point out the most vulnerable claim of the Christian faith [in 1 Corinthians 15:12–19].

若耶穌不像使徒們所宣稱的那樣曾經活過作過一些事說過一些話那麼基督教就是假的。如果還有比復活更好的解釋那麼基督教就是在浪費他們的時間。If Jesus did not live, do, and say the things claimed by the apostles, then Christianity is false. If there is a better explanation for the resurrection, then Christians are simply wasting their time.

通過指出其脆弱之處保羅實際上是在指出基督信仰的力量。他如此深信復活——可以證實耶穌所宣稱的一切的事件——是真實的歷史也是可以證明的以至於他指出如何證明其為假——幾乎是一種挑戰。基督徒的宣稱是可以被調查、被檢驗的。這個挑戰在其他宗教裏是找不到類似例子的。沒有任何其他宗教經典會告訴你如何摧毀自己的宣稱。By pointing out this vulnerability, Paul was really pointing out the strength of Christianity. So convinced was he of the historicity and verifiability of the resurrection, the event that confirmed the claims of Jesus, that he pointed out how to prove it false—almost as a challenge. Christian claims can be investigated and tested. This challenge has no parallel in other religions. No other sacred text shows how to destroy its own claims.

初代教會的教父們當他們製作了尼西亞信經——普世教會所接受的信經——說明他們明白耶穌的歷史性的重要性。信經說「祂為要拯救我們世人……在本丟彼拉多手下為我們釘在十字架上受難埋葬。」為什麼要提到本丟彼拉多呢?哪一條教義是以他為根據的?答案是:沒有任何一條教義是以比拉多為根據的。提到他只是為了提醒我們,這些事情是發生在歷史上某個特定時間,發生在一個真實的人身上的真實事件。The church fathers showed they understood the importance of Jesus’ historicity when they crafted the Nicene Creed, the universally accepted creed of the church. The creed says, “For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate; he suffered death and was buried.” Why mention Pontius Pilate? What doctrine is based on him? The answer is: none; there is no doctrine based on Pilate. He is mentioned to remind us that these were real events happening to a real person at a particular point in history.

(Doug Powell, Holman Quick Source Guide to Christian Apologetics, pp. 11, 16, 18)